Tag Archives: ancestry - Page 2

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0141-HRP0150

Here are the admixture results using Reference 3 for Harappa participants HRP0141 to HRP0150.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

Related Reading:

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0131-HRP0140

Here are the admixture results using Reference 3 for Harappa participants HRP0131 to HRP0140.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

Related Reading:

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0121-HRP0130

Here are the admixture results using Reference 3 for Harappa participants HRP0121 to HRP0130.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

Related Reading:

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0111-HRP0120

Here are the admixture results using Reference 3 for Harappa participants HRP0111 to HRP0120.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

Related Reading:

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0101-HRP0110

Here are the admixture results using Reference 3 for Harappa participants HRP0101 to HRP0110.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

HRP0101 has 1/8th Gujarati Patel ancestry but has 0% Onge component while the expected value would be about 3%. Also, his/her being 1/2 Romany is not reflected in a 70% European percentage.

HRP0105, an Iranian Kurd, is similar to the Iraqi Kurd HRP0059.

HRP0108, a Halai Bhatia, looks mostly like Punjabis and Sindhis in the admixture results.

HRP0110, Mexican/Jewish, is half Native American and likely a quarter Jewish.

Related Reading:

Admixture (Ref3 K=11) HRP0091-HRP0100

Here's my first admixture run using Reference 3 for Harappa participants with FTDNA data.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

If the above interactive charts are not working, here's a static bar graph.

Since this is my first analysis of FTDNA data, I asked HRP0006 to provide me with his FTDNA results (HRP0093) too so they can be compared. Let's see how that turned out.

HRP0006 HRP0093
C1 S Asian 49.31% 49.06%
C2 Onge 14.13% 13.70%
C3 E Asian 1.12% 0.00%
C4 SW Asian 14.65% 12.52%
C5 European 18.88% 22.44%
C6 Siberian 0.00% 0.78%
C7 W African 0.00% 0.00%
C8 Papuan 0.54% 0.01%
C9 American 1.35% 1.48%
C10 San/Pygmy 0.00% 0.00%
C11 E African 0.00% 0.00%

There are differences of up to 3% but generally the results are reasonably close.

HRP0095 and HRP0100 thought they had possible South Asian ancestry. That seems fairly unlikely at least in the last few generations since their Onge component is zero or very low.

Related Reading:

Harappa (1-90) K=11 Admixture Ref3

Here's my first admixture run using Reference 3 for Harappa participants. Since K=11 was the run with the Onge-ASI connection, I ran admixture at K=11 with all the 90 Harappa participants.

You can see the participant results in a spreadsheet as well as their ethnic breakdowns and the reference population results.

Here's our bar chart and table. Remember you can click on the legend or the table headers to sort.

Using the comparison between the Onge component here and Reich et al's Ancestral South Indian one, I get the following linear regression.

The correlation is 0.9949 which is probably as high as it can get. So let's calculate the ASI percentage for all the Harappa participants.

Note that I didn't calculate the ASI percentage for those who had a really low Onge component since the linear regression above would not be valid outside the range we have in our original data.

You can see the percentages in a spreadsheet too.

Let's compare with the Dodecad ANI-ASI results. I have 22.5% ASI here while it was 20.6% in the Dodecad analysis. Overall, it seems like my technique results in about 2% more ASI than Dodecad's, with a few exceptions: Like Razib who jumps from 34.3% to 43.3% (averaging his parents who are very close).

Related Reading:

Admixture K=12, HRP0081-HRP0090

Here are their ethnic backgrounds and the results spreadsheet. Also relevant are the reference I admixture results.

If you can't see the interactive bar chart above, here's a static image.

The two new Assyrians (HRP0081 & HRP0082) are pretty similar to the earlier Assyrian participant HRP0010.

HRP0087 is an interesting case with ancestry from France, Martinique, Madagascar and India. I can't be certain but the ratio of South Asian to Balochistan/Caucasus components seems to point in the direction of northern Indian ancestry. I definitely need to do a supervised admixture run for the mixed participants.

HRP0089 is Kazakh and has one-third Siberian component. That's higher than Uygurs (21%) and Uzbeks (23%) in my reference set. HRP0089 also has little bit more European component than the average Uygur or Uzbek in my reference.

PS. This was run using Admixture version 1.04.

Related Reading:

Admixture K=4, HRP0081-HRP0090

Here are their ethnic backgrounds and the results spreadsheet. Also relevant are the reference I admixture results.

It would be interesting to see how the Kazakh and the mixed French/Madagascar/Martinique/Indian participants get on K=12.

If you can't see the interactive bar chart above, here's a static image.

PS. This was run using Admixture version 1.04 and using reference I. Probably the last batch for both.

PPS. For some reason, my efforts to reduce the font in the table are unsuccessful. Since we are close to 100 participants now, I need to find a better way for you guys to visualize these results. May be a slice at one time.

Related Reading:

Admixture K=12, HRP0071-HRP0080

Here are their ethnic backgrounds and the results spreadsheet. Also relevant are the reference I admixture results.

If you can't see the interactive bar chart above, here's a static image.

Since I don't have any Native American samples in my reference populations, the Brazilian participant (HRP0074) shows up as having Northeast Asian and Siberian.

PS. This was run using Admixture version 1.04.

Related Reading: